In the early days of the World Wide Web, those of us trying to figure out this new medium (especially business-wise) used to hear the phrase, “content is king” all the time. It was in part because there was so much emphasis on new and startling technologies that the purpose of it all sometimes got lost in the shuffle. It was also a way to raise the value and visibility of the content providers themselves, to be at least slightly commensurate with the exalted status of the technology suppliers. Everyone needed to get invested if this thing was gonna work.
Content is still king, but it rules increasingly by committee. The biggest web content provider is now the vast array of users themselves. Whereas once it took resources and expertise to disseminate information online, friendly technologies like blogs, social networks, and real-time communication tools such as Twitter now make it possible for anyone to be a broadcaster. What makes any particular content, communication, or information valuable, however, is the degree to which it is embraced, approved, and shared.
Providing sharable content is already a new fundamental for online marketing. It starts with the notion that branding is as much about expertise as it is about image and message. Ideas and information comprise expertise, and can be offered in a range of formats — text, image, video, even games and widgets and mini-applications — and through a variety of delivery systems. So, it’s no surprise, then, when even the likes of Microsoft gets in on content sharing.
And yet, in this accelerated world of ever-evolving modes of marketing communications, some traditional principles still apply. “It’s all in the execution,” for example, or, put another way, “the devil is in the details.” Embracing new paradigms is not enough. Smart strategy is useless without tight tactics.
Let’s look at a rather instructive example.

Microsoft runs a banner ad on Wired, and right inside the banner is the offer of what appears to be a useful article. Smart strategy: Create expert content, share expert content. And they are apparently making it very easy to get — my initial expectation is that I can download it right from the banner.
Except that I can’t.click for more
I click, and I am redirected away from my intentional location to where Microsoft wants me, which is not where I want me. This is of course the reason that click-through rates are so low. Not because people aren’t interested in what brands have to offer, but because a banner click means, in the traditional paradigm, a redirect away from where a user wants to be. This remains the behavior of a vast majority of banners, despite the fact that today’s technologies allow for virtually every type of interactive feature a web site could offer right inside the banner itself.
Okay, fine, so they haven’t quite gotten around to putting the download right inside the banner. I assume I will be linked directly to the article.

Foiled again.
Now, at this point, as a user, once I realize I am not being given what I was promised on that click (after already being disappointed that it didn’t come right from the banner in the first place), I’m out of there. I don’t hang around long enough to give these jokers the benefit of my attention to try and figure out how to get what I was promised in the first place. But because, as an online marketing professional, I am now rather amused at how transparently self-serving and cynical their approach is (not to mention clueless), I persist.
“Amusing” turns to “laughable” when after a good 20 seconds or so, I still can’t find the article.
Microsoft’s online advertising concern may well be reporting impressive click-through rates on that banner. But I suspect the rate of “bait and switch” impressions among the clickers is just as high.
click to reduce